Re: 29/3 Row

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
1 message Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: 29/3 Row

john d. pearce

HI Nigel

Sorry cannot now make Monday , doctor's appointment.

Best Regards

John D.


On 20 March 2021 at 19:57 "nigel [via Langstone Cutters RC]" <[hidden email]> wrote:

I am very happy to support this attempt to make SW more accountable, by any legal means!
I am also in total agreement with Mike's 4 punchline points.
I am also sad to think that the position of SW has not materially changed since I first got involved in monitoring the water quality around our shores, and especially in Langstone harbour, fifty (yes, 50 !!! ) years ago.
  The only changes have occurred when they have so blatantly flouted all health legislation (and got caught), that they realised that the cost of the fines would (did) outweigh the cost of compliance.
Back in 1974 they were mandated to upgrade secondary (in some cases primary) treatment to tertiary treatment. UV treatment of effluent took about a quarter of a century for them to belatedly install in some plants.
I could go on......(I know I frequently do! )



If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:
http://langstone-cutters-rc.1095392.n5.nabble.com/Sewage-in-the-harbour-tp23408p23421.html
To start a new topic under Langstone Cutters RC, email [hidden email]
To unsubscribe from Langstone Cutters RC, click here.
NAML